Sunday, January 20, 2013

Adam Lanza Death Certificate says Dec. 13th 2012 NOT 14th (day of shooting) Nancy Lanza's Obituary

Adam Lanza's death certificate says the 13th as his day of death not the 14th, which is the day of the shooting.  Adam's Lanza's death information at the bottom.

WOW I just noticed the day he was born April 22nd.  BIG day for "certain" people....

From what others have said in interviews about Nancy is she kept to herself... this obituary does not seem to say that.  It in fact claims the opposite.


Just as Mike Powers said in his interview.... Nancy Lanza's Obituary does not mention Adam Lanza at all.

NEWTOWN, Conn. - Nancy J. (Champion) Lanza, 52, a former resident of Kingston, N.H. died Dec. 14, 2012, in Connecticut.

Born in Salem, Mass., the daughter of Dorothy (Huse) (Champion) Hanson and the late Donald Champion, she was raised in Kingston, N.H., and graduated from Sanborn Regional High School with the class of 1978.

She attended the University of New Hampshire and worked in the New Accounts Division of John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company of Boston until 1992.

A resident of Newtown since 1998, Nancy was involved as a volunteer in local charity work, especially the local women's shelters. She had many lifelong friends locally and around the world, and enjoyed flower gardening, travel, the arts, and museums. An avid Red Sox fan who shared season's tickets, she also enjoyed listening to jazz music.

She is survived by a son, Ryan J. Lanza of Hoboken, N.J.; her mother, Dorothy (Huse) (Champion) Hanson of Barrington, N.H.; two brothers, James M. Champion of Kingston, N.H., and Donald R. Champion of Colorado; a sister and brother-in-law, Carol A. Gould of Maine; her former husband, Peter Lanza of Connecticut; her special nieces and nephews, and several aunts, uncles, cousins, and many friends.

.

services: A private family service was held on Thursday, Dec. 20, and a public me

Here is Nancy Lanza's Death Information


Nancy Lanza: Social Security Death Index (SSDI) Death Record
Name: Nancy Lanza
State of Issue: New Hampshire
Date of Birth: Tuesday September 06, 1960
Date of Death: Friday December 14, 2012
Est. Age at Death: 52 years, 3 months, 8 days
Confirmation: Proven


Adam P. Lanza: Social Security Death Index (SSDI) Death Record

Name:Adam P. Lanza
State of Issue:New Hampshire
Date of Birth:Wednesday  April  22, 1992
Date of Death:Thursday  December  13, 2012
Est. Age at Death:20 years, 7 months, 21 days
Confirmation: Proven

56 comments:

  1. Nancy's obit: No mention of Adam
    http://www.eagletribune.com/obituaries/x964855281/Nancy-J-Lanza-52

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She wasn't survived by him is why he is not on her obit. Survived by means they are still alive.

      Delete
    2. Our obits always contain, "pre-deceased by a brother, son, husband, etc."

      Delete
    3. GEE I wonder why?

      Delete
    4. It should have shown she was preceded by Adam. As on official public record that's how deceased immediate family members are cited on an obituary.

      Delete
    5. Only if the family chooses to

      Delete
  2. Whay are they issued by New Hampshire and not Connecticut? I thought Nancy Lanza worked for Morgan Stanley?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I looked up my grandmother, the death certificate is issued by the state of the individuals birth. He was born in n.h., that's why.

      Delete
    2. That actually only shows where their SS numbers were issued. The state issuing the death certificate is not listed. Genealogy.com has a page explaining that.

      Delete
    3. The state of issue is for his birth certificate. He was born in NH.

      Delete
  3. So, you believe information provided by an overworked understaffed agency that is likely a TYPO as solid proof that someone was dead before a time quite a few people saw him alive, vs some "it's all a big conspiracy involving 6 year olds"?! THAT is your go to position? Means you're not just a nut but a moron as well.

    Hmm, how many reasons could there be for Adam not to show on his moms obit? Like maybe the family didn't want to detract from the loss of HER?!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "So you believe information provided by an overworked understaffed agency." As opposed to what, the media and the government? Clearly, they're lying, and I suppose you believe there were WMDs in Iraq, too! I don't have a problem with you believing everything they tell you, but why call someone a "moron" because they're keeping their eyes open? There are many, many inconsistencies here; too many to ignore!

      Delete
    2. The "proven" part of that photo actually signifies that the Social Security Administration reviewed and verified the birth and death dates. Genealogy.com has an article explaining that.

      Delete
    3. People have been trying to post this info on CNN's wall (and other MSM's sites), the comment gets removed within minutes, and the poster gets blocked. If it was just a typo, why would they do that?

      Delete
    4. people don't make typos on purpose. It is a mistake and it got corrected. That site has made them before. it got both of my grandparents dates wrong.

      Delete
    5. To be exact, NO ONE actually saw Adam alive that day. The person they saw had his head covered to keep prying eyes from seeing his face, assuming it was a "him".

      The biggest laugh is the Governor relaying what the official inside events had been, telling that there was one surviving child in the first classroom, but NO survivors in the second room, yet they claim that SOTO (in the second classroom) was saying something about the children were elsewhere... gee she must have had the PA on and a mic, or maybe they all have ESP... total fraud.

      Worst of all, is the math.. Adam was a slight built, desk jockey, gamer with no athletic anything and consequently his photo shows someone at 16 (basically full grown) who weighed about 120 lbs and no sign of any heavy labor experience.

      NOW, add up the weights of the hardware necessary to shoot that many rounds as we are told by many of the officials = bulletproof vest, quite heavy, 100s of rounds of ammo, gear and guns = about FORTY POUNDS... try hefting that, even if you're big and athletic and then CHARGE AROUND THE SCHOOL SHOOTING PEOPLE WITH HUNDREDS OF ROUNDS, ?talking to Soto? and be done with that monstrous exertion in 10 minutes, now remembering we're imagining a 120 lb deskjockey, totally impossible, absolutely overloaded, crawling& stumbling at best.

      TOTALLY IMPOSSIBLE THAT ADAM WAS THE KILLER. And while we're seeing that HE DIDN'T DO IT, let's also similarly conclude that they are also lying about the now-seen-as-innocent Adam being the killer who blew Nancy's face away. They killed Nancy and Adam's death was not some suicide.

      Too many people HATE PEOPLE WHO ARE DIFFERENT, and so they all swallow the government's lies about Adam as the government knew they would. So they planned more disinformation for us to sort through and demolish the worst.

      Delete
    6. You need to look at the dad Peter Lanza I believe is the second father of a mass shooter set to testify in the lybor scandal. That's right James Holmes dadwas the first. Thing that make you go hmmm another government black op to take away our guns.

      Delete
  4. Nope Anonymous who posted at 1:34 AM, even when a parent is killed by their child, (or visey-versey) that child is normally listed in the obituary. No overworked or understaffed agency could have POSSIBLY gotten THAT date wrong. The date 12/14/12 will live forever in most of our minds as it should have in the mind of someone whose job it is to record death dates & details. I wouldn't call this little tidbit an anomalie or inconsistency, no...I would say this is likely the TRUTH. & it lends to the theory that Adam was just a patsy.

    ReplyDelete
  5. What does their Rabbi have to say about all this?

    ReplyDelete
  6. All of the naysayers need to look at the videos that are calling into question this entire Sandy Hook story. Much of it was taken from the same things you saw on the news, but while you were in a state of acceptance. It is time you see it again with a more critical eye.

    Spend a little time on each point that is being made and take the blinders off. There is not one thing right about the story as it was delivered on regular news. Your main problem seems to be that you want to believe the state/gov story. Wanting to believe it doesn't make it so.

    Use the brain God gave you and LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE. It's the same thing you saw on the news with things pointed out that you would have missed because you are accustomed to believing what is said on the news. All you need to get over that is something in the news that you have personal knowledge of and you will understand what everyone is saying. Open your eyes. Sorry I had to go with "Anonymous". Let's just add a B to the end of Anonymous to distinguish me from all the others.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I personally looked up every single victim in the SSDI. I can't explain why, but at least six did not show up in the SSDI on my search, and one of those that did showed up with the wrong birthdate. All those who weren't listed, I performed several searches. What's really strange is, Adam Lanza is not showing up at all now, so I wonder if they pulled it, because of the error. Another thing that's worth mentioning is, Emilie Parker was listed as deceased. There's a lot of controversy surrounded her father--who many believe to be a crisis actor--after he gave an announcement the day of the shooting, which appeared to be staged. His daughter, Emilie, was also reportedly photographed with Obama the day after the shooting. I also seen where a mother is claiming her daughter's photo--which she claims was taken off Flickr--is being used as one of the victims under a different name.

    Daniel Barden – 9/25/2005 - Birthdate listed as 09/27/2005 on SSDI
    Marquez-Ana M Greene – 4/4/2006 – Not listed in SSDI
    Chase Kowalski – 10/31/2005 - Not listed in SSDI
    Jesse Lewis – 6/30/2006 – Not listed in SSDI
    Grace McDonnell – 11/4/2005 – Not listed in SSDI
    Lauren Russeau – 6/10/1982 – Not listed in SSDI
    Mary Sherlach – 2/11/1956 – Not listed in SSDI

    ReplyDelete
  8. If it had been "Friday, December 13, 2012" I might have thought it was a typo. But is says *both*..."Thursday" AND "December 13" on the date line. This greatly reduces the chance it is a simple typo.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Totally agree... I was about to say this...

      Delete
  9. Best info from Mike Powers.

    Any further info after his interview above?

    ReplyDelete
  10. I looked at the evidence. It says you are fucking nuts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL thanks for the laugh, especially since the above is from a site and the date is clearly the day before.... so I guess they are the ones that are nuts for putting the wrong date and my just reporting it. LOL Some people are so funny.

      Delete
    2. Yeah, because obviously there is no such thing as photoshop.

      Delete
  11. Im sorry to say but its all a fraud. The shooting never happened. Its the government using this to try and scare us. Trying to take our guns from us and put us in consentration camps.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Really? Go find something to do. You're sick.

      Delete
    2. You're an asshole. I have a friend whose child was killed there and another friend whose child was in kindergarten there and has nightmares every single night. It fucking happened you sick fucking loser. get a life.

      Delete
    3. Which child was it? who's parent you are friends with? just curious.

      Delete
  12. April 22 isn't a big day for "certain" people. April 20th is. Just saying.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. April 22nd is a "big" day for me because it is MY birthday--also Earth Day!!!

      Delete
    2. Was her obit going to say that she was preceded in death by Adam or that she and son, Adam, passed away on same date??? Or, was she going to say that "contrary to Gov't opinion", my son, Adam, killed me, then 26 others, therefore, I denounce him as my son. Not sure what to make of this omission.

      Delete
    3. I don't think she is going to say anything, she is kind of dead. Also don't think she had anything to do with writing here obituary.

      Delete
  13. The biggest trick the devil ever pulled of is making everyone believe he does not exist. Looking at time lines,agendas and motives will lead to the truth.
    Sometimes our rulers either instigate or use a tragedy or an event to push their goal of grandeur and world domination.
    assassination of archduke Ferdinand lead to world war 1
    the attack on the radio station Gleiwitz in poland was the Trigger for world war 2
    the throwing out the windows of the council men off Prague started the 30 year war 1618-1648 .
    more people where reported killed in Newtown CT than all combined dead I mentioned in the 3 events.

    Draw your conclusions!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Sherrie, thanks for the research that you have beeen doing. Especially for posting a screen shot from Geneologybank.com of Adam Lanza's SSDI record. Apparently they have taken it down, since your link above just goes to a generic page. Do you have to be a subscriber to see it now or has it been removed globally from the site?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. they took down the page and created a new one with the date of death as dec. 14th

      Delete
  15. If you don't think the gov will try to miss lead us for there own agenda check out operation northwoods

    ReplyDelete
  16. The government lies no question about it What's sad is most people are to ignorant or lazy to open their eyes to this stuff. It's like talking to a tree! And we are called the nuts?

    ReplyDelete
  17. I do hope and believe people are beginning to wake up. In light of the big movement to try and disarm citizens, and such public knowledge of the gov't buying up all this ammo, and the no more hesitation targets...well, keep praying, folks.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Even if it was a typo I would think if the shooting really happened they would def get the date right because of the tgpe of incident it was

    ReplyDelete
  19. Sandy hook was nor fake it happened and people I know lost loved ones

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. who? Please tell us-

      Delete
    2. I would like to know also . . . are you going to back up your statement with any truth? or just type what you have been INSTRUCTED to type?

      Delete
  20. Did she work for Morgan Stanley? If so, there's your motive right there as to why they became the patsies for a fake shooting that also serves the institutions purpose of gun confiscation and more concern about american terrorists. Obviously, she knew something that Morgan Stanley felt uncomfortable about being released.

    ReplyDelete
  21. So the mom worked for Morgan Stanley, the dad was set to testify about LIBOR because he was head of a financial institution, James Holmes' dad was as well, as he was lead scientist for FICO.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Adam P. Lanza: Social Security Death Index (SSDI) Death Record

    Name: Adam P. Lanza
    State of Issue: New Hampshire
    Date of Birth: Wednesday April 22, 1992
    Date of Death: Thursday December 13, 2012
    Est. Age at Death: 20 years, 7 months, 21 days
    Confirmation: Proven

    ReplyDelete
  23. Adam P. Lanza: Social Security Death Index (SSDI) Death Record

    Name: Adam P. Lanza
    State of Issue: New Hampshire
    Date of Birth: Wednesday April 22, 1992
    Date of Death: Friday December 14, 2012
    Est. Age at Death: 20 years, 7 months, 22 days
    Confirmation: Proven

    ReplyDelete
  24. What an idiot the person above me is? The date was changed after everyone saw it and made a fuss about it. The cached website was even taken down. Covering their tracks from a big mistake they made. Sandyhook was another false flag

    ReplyDelete
  25. All those people connected to Nancy and NONE have come forward to talk about ADAM? Strange to say the least!

    ReplyDelete
  26. You guys are missing the biggest thing of all...why didn't they try and save the lives of those children? Let me rephrase that///Why weren't any paramedics allowed to transport children with gunshot wounds as soon as possible? Why didn't they try and resussitate any of the children? Instead they just locked up the school, and any child who may have lived from immediate medical attention just layed on the floor of the school and died? Maybe your still missing my point...NOBODY PERFORMED CPR, OR USED THE SHOCK PADDLES BY PARAMEDICS ON ANY OF THOSE CHILDREN. It is not possible for all of the children to have died instantly...the numbers don't add up that way...I said all we saw was people standing around the school...reporters saying no injured children would be put into ambulances...therefore; no shock paddles, no resussitation, no medical attention to any of those kids while we just watched people standing around outside the school....that blows my mind!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  27. THE STATE OF ISSUE IS NOT FOR THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE. THE STATE OF ISSUE IS WHERE THE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER WAS APPLIED FOR. NEW HAMPSHIRE IS WHERE NANCY AND/OR PETER APPLIED FOR ADAM'S SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Sandy Hook: Sherlach Connects To Relocation, Simu…: http://youtu.be/8W_AYV_Fh3s

    ReplyDelete